Deep Thoughts...
Jul. 30th, 2003 10:57 amSo maybe I can think and entertain myself again. My head has been a busy place this morning and I am grateful about that.
I'm crediting
sockkpuppett for letting me talk some things out, distracting me with season 5 Angel thoughts and encouraging me to just play with "Battleflag." I have no clear idea where it is going, but it is shaping into something - something quite different from where I was headed originally, but which feels much more real. If that makes any sense. None of what I have in the timeline currently works beyond a few seconds here and a few seconds there, but that is something. If all the seconds just line up and I get a full sequence that appeals, I think I'll just go into automatic mode and it will all fall into place. Which would be nice, as I immediately start freaking out that I will never be able to make a half-way decent vid again. Maybe I won't. I do think that I am stagnating stylistically - I watch "Superstar" and "Nightmares" and I think I should be doing so much more - I'm laying clips and it all looks well and good, but I should be advancing more - making the source my own - creating parallels and tying in unrelated scenes together - demonstrating the relatedness of the emotion/experience in clip A to clip B in some very cool way... I'm focused specifically on the razor cut sequence of Faith in the grave and then dancing in the club in "Superstar" and the clip of Cordy in front of Angelus's cage intercut with the white eyes in "Nightmares" - I should be doing that. Not that exactly, of course, but the elusive "that" those vids represent to me. The music in "Battleflag" does not want this static, clip A, then clip B then clip C approach that I am sandbagging it with. I don't want to vid like that and that may be one of my major beefs with "66" - aside from the Pure Sweet Love -- I really just laid clips down to represent the song. Not a lot of manipulation beyond image cropping. As a stress-relief project it was fine, but not artistically fulfilling. I'm also dissatisfied with the spinning movement at the front of the vid. It just does not work the way I wanted it too. It's fine and all - but in my head it could be much more. I just couldn't get what was in my head into Premiere. I need VVC.
eliade also had a post that made me think when I read it this morning about Eminem. The post was about RPS, but I tend to not focus on that - it was the Eminem-mention that grabbed me. It's strange - I am at turns excited, disturbed, entertained and provoked by his music - and I don't take that lightly. I think he is a very talented artist and I appreciate the rawness and the honesty behind his music - even when it offends me. Actually, I know on a basic level that some of the stuff should offend me. But it doesn't. It shocks me. Some of it saddens me - but I'm not offended. I suppose I am intrigued? Maybe... it reminds me of the time when I was fifteen and totally into Guns N Roses and my aunt, the scholar and a lovely, serious woman to boot, was concerned. Didn't the negative attitude toward women and the downright misogynistic lyrics offend me? How could I listen to it? And I had to tell her - no. It didn't. Hell - I'd sing along to "I Used to Love Her" and "Back Off Bitch" and have a helluva time doing it as well and that realization bugged me. Not the music, but the fact that I liked it and had no adverse reaction to the material.
I'm a feminist. I want equality and damn it, I just want to be treated as if my chromosomal make-up does not matter. If you want to see me on a rant get me started on the feminization of the "girl" athletic team names in school. For example; I went to college at the University of Kentucky. The mascot is the Wildcat. Easy enough, until you look at the women's basketball team and realize that they are the "Lady Kats (or Cats - been a while, forgive the errors)" - same with the University of Louisville - the Cardinals, right? Unless you are a "Lady Card" -- WTF is up with that? Are they afraid we will forget that the athletes on these teams do not have penises without the special names? Why can't they be the Wildcats or the Cardinals or hell take it back to high school where Dawn played varsity Basketball and was a Trojanette. What the hell is a Trojanette? I have the same sort of feelings about genderized words like actor/actress, waiter/waitress but I will stop now. No I won't - the lovely and powerful
missmurchison sent me a link this morning that steamed me up as well (as I think she knew it would)- about the "Metrosexual" male - he is straight, but in touch with his feminine side - which according to the article means he cares about his appearance. Fuck. When did grooming become a strictly feminine trait? Why can't he be in touch with his narcissistic side instead?
But I made a sudden realization driving to work today. The fact that I enjoy music that is openly derogatory to women is not a contradiction to my being a feminist. I do not identify with the women in these songs on any level whatsoever. I never have. A buncha bimbette supermodels want to bitch-slap themselves around in "November Rain" - more power to them, but I don't get it and it is not me. I resent having to feel offended on their behalf because we share common genital features. Nuh uh. Not gonna do it. It's like that whole "Hunting Bambi" scam. Before the scam part was revealed, I was sickened that there are people out there that would want to do it, but I find it hard to work myself up into a feministic uproar because some silly people out there that would let themselves be shot with a paint gun while naked and there are silly people that would get their rocks off shooting a naked person. I felt bad on a human scale, but I don't feel my womanhood or ovarianness or whatever was in jepoardy because of this. Because it isn't me. It isn't me on any level. And I know all about how attitudes become pervasive and it could eventually effect me because I share a gender with these twits and yeah - that would get me up in a roar. Not because I think we should respect all people with a vagina equally. Hell, no - I don't respect those women at all. I don't. I don't respect the men involved either. Fuck gender - they're idiots and I don't like stupid.
So - I'm not really certain what I am trying to say here. But, I am having big, deep thoughts again that make kinda, sorta sense to me and that is a wonderful thing.
I'm crediting
I'm a feminist. I want equality and damn it, I just want to be treated as if my chromosomal make-up does not matter. If you want to see me on a rant get me started on the feminization of the "girl" athletic team names in school. For example; I went to college at the University of Kentucky. The mascot is the Wildcat. Easy enough, until you look at the women's basketball team and realize that they are the "Lady Kats (or Cats - been a while, forgive the errors)" - same with the University of Louisville - the Cardinals, right? Unless you are a "Lady Card" -- WTF is up with that? Are they afraid we will forget that the athletes on these teams do not have penises without the special names? Why can't they be the Wildcats or the Cardinals or hell take it back to high school where Dawn played varsity Basketball and was a Trojanette. What the hell is a Trojanette? I have the same sort of feelings about genderized words like actor/actress, waiter/waitress but I will stop now. No I won't - the lovely and powerful
But I made a sudden realization driving to work today. The fact that I enjoy music that is openly derogatory to women is not a contradiction to my being a feminist. I do not identify with the women in these songs on any level whatsoever. I never have. A buncha bimbette supermodels want to bitch-slap themselves around in "November Rain" - more power to them, but I don't get it and it is not me. I resent having to feel offended on their behalf because we share common genital features. Nuh uh. Not gonna do it. It's like that whole "Hunting Bambi" scam. Before the scam part was revealed, I was sickened that there are people out there that would want to do it, but I find it hard to work myself up into a feministic uproar because some silly people out there that would let themselves be shot with a paint gun while naked and there are silly people that would get their rocks off shooting a naked person. I felt bad on a human scale, but I don't feel my womanhood or ovarianness or whatever was in jepoardy because of this. Because it isn't me. It isn't me on any level. And I know all about how attitudes become pervasive and it could eventually effect me because I share a gender with these twits and yeah - that would get me up in a roar. Not because I think we should respect all people with a vagina equally. Hell, no - I don't respect those women at all. I don't. I don't respect the men involved either. Fuck gender - they're idiots and I don't like stupid.
So - I'm not really certain what I am trying to say here. But, I am having big, deep thoughts again that make kinda, sorta sense to me and that is a wonderful thing.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 09:46 am (UTC)My two cents.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-31 06:57 am (UTC)I totally agree that more often than not the lyrics are meant rather tongue in cheek - they are deliberately provocative to do just that - provoke. And the stakes are continuously raised.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 09:53 am (UTC)I love Eminem. I can't look at his stuff as even being misogynistic, because it doesn't threaten me. I'm, for once, secure in who I am, in my femaleness (I hesitate to say "femininity," but I know I have that in spades as well, and am happy with it) and its inherent power, and bitch-slappin''ho songs don't offend me so much as they entertain me. I think Eminem is a remarkable poet and performer, and more power to him.
Feminism. What is it really? Now? I feel that I'm a complete (compleat.. hee) feminist right this minute, you know? I'm comfortable in my identity and sexuality. Men don't make me feel powerless because only I can do that. And I reserve the right to be a woman. I read something by Robert Heinlein--one of his strong female characters was speaking on the subject, and I totally identified:
"I am strong for women's rights but was never taken in by unisex nonsense. I don't yearn to be equal; Sharpie is as unequal as possible, with all the perks and bonuses and special privileges that come from being one of the superior sex. If a man fails to hold a door for me, I fail to see him and step on his instep. I feel no shame in making lavish use of the strongest muscles, namely male ones (but my own strongest muscle is dedicated to the service of men -- noblesse oblige). I don't begrudge men one whit of their natural advantages as long as they respect mine. I am female and I like it that way."
And that, my friends, is your modern science-fiction literary quote of the day. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 10:40 am (UTC)I'm also becoming more comfortable with femaleness - but I'm still determining what that means to me. I'm not like the women I typically saw portrayed on TV growing up - at that point and still to this day I tend to identify much more with male characters. I think it is that male characters are allowed to be strong - without it taking away from their maleness. It was expected. If he failed to live up to that expectation he was a failure. And unfortunately, it wasn't something equally expected of women characters - the Clarice Starlings and Ripleys were that much more startling in their deviation from the norm. That is why the BtVS final meant so much to me - these girls are allowed to be strong - not only that - they were expected to be strong. To be heroes.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 10:46 am (UTC)I think it's just... being secure in your own strength, isn't it? Or not curling up into a mewling, helpless ball and wanting "someone else" to do it, whatever it is.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 10:49 am (UTC)Wimping out. It's not just for little girls anymore! WIMP EQUALITY NOW!
Issues
Date: 2003-07-30 10:39 am (UTC)Re: Issues
Date: 2003-07-30 10:47 am (UTC)I have a ton of issues. Anger is one of them. But not rage. I have no rage and mores the pity. Actually - my anger is becoming lesser with age as well.
One has to seriously ask? Why is Liz so angry? Answer: Not enough mosh pits as an adolescent. I shoulda gone to that Korn concert and seeing Rancid only once was a mistake. Ah, my misbegotton youth...
Re: Issues
Date: 2003-07-30 08:11 pm (UTC)Also, UCB would identify who he is and never uses abbreviations like "LOL".
Re: Issues
Date: 2003-07-31 04:14 am (UTC)I thought so - but being addressed as "Liz" threw me.
Re: Issues
Date: 2003-07-31 05:12 am (UTC)Quotes of the day -
Spike: Oh bollocks. All the rubbish people keep sticking in my head, it's a wonder there's any room for my brain.
[Spike is chained to a bathtub]
Spike: I'll bloody kill you!
Buffy: What are you going to do, lick me to death?
Re: Issues
Date: 2003-07-31 06:23 am (UTC)I also wondered if you were an ex-boss of mine playing a trick - but since I talked to him yesterday, I doubt it - but if it is you A. - then speak up more often - we'd love to hear from you.
I just realized that I share too much.
Re: Issues
Date: 2003-07-31 06:27 am (UTC)I love him so.
Re: Issues
Date: 2003-07-31 10:49 am (UTC)Re: Issues
Date: 2003-07-31 11:18 am (UTC)Anyhoo - I know you? I know you as in you hang out on WeBoB or Nummy Treat or I know you *know* you as in we were hanging at the Atomic last Friday night? Cause I got to say - other than my nephew, I know of no other real-life person that can quote *both* ST:NG or Roswell. And the spelling of your posts is much to good to be him (dyslexic kid). If I do know you in real-life give me a call and we can discuss the utter idiocy of making Tess evil. I hated that.
And hey - if ya want an LJ - I got codes. Oodles of codes. But first ya have to tell me who you are...
no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 10:44 am (UTC)Re: feminism and music -- I hear you on this. I don't listen to much explictly misogynist music, but my musical tastes were initially shaped by what I now recognize as implicitly sexist music . . . and every now and then I feel weird about that.
But I've also thought a lot about what exactly my problems are with sexist music (and images, and roles, etc), and have decided that the problem isn't that individual sexist songs/artists/whatever exist; the problem is that so often it's hard to find anything else. It's like Naomi Wolf said about images of super-thin women: if those images were only *one* type of image out of a broad range of representations of women and women's bodies, then their power to do damage would be seriously lessened.
I *do* have access to feminist music, feminist images, feminist responses to and interventions in pop culture. And I have the critical acumen to see misogyny for what it is, call it by name, laugh at it, and refuse to perpetuate it.
And so do you.
So we can enjoy what we enjoy, take what we need from it, and reject the parts that demean us -- and, of course, we can work towards making feminist music and art and ideas available to lots more people.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-31 06:44 am (UTC)I'm beginning to remember just that - as "Battleflag" comes together, secon by second - I am reminded that normally inspiration doesn't just fall out of my head onto the timeline. I hit vid farr with the last few (not including 66- that was vid-distraction) and I think everything should come as easily now. Vidding is work, fun work and fulfilling work, but work all the same and I just need to keep that in mind.
the problem is that so often it's hard to find anything else.
I find this extremely interesting and I think it applies to what Lum and I were discussing a few comments up from here - I identified with male characters growing up more than female because they were more like what I *wanted* to be. - Plus they had all the cool stuff.
I wonder about my musical tastes and that the majority of artists that I listen to on any given day are men. There are women artists that I like - don't get me wrong - and I discover more all the time (esp thanks to you)...but I seem to always find myself gravitating toward male voices. Perhaps this has to do with some kinda formative bias? Or maybe it is because there was a definite dearth of female artists that I listened to in high school and college - once I hit grunge rock, I had Luscious Jackson, L7 and Sonic Youth (and SY is kinda not except for Kim) and I really didn't like L.J. or L7 as much as other bands, but I felt obligated to listen to them because they were the female representation.
And now I am all tangential and stream of conciousness-y and really I should be working so I'll shut up now.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-31 05:52 pm (UTC)This was me, too, in a big way.
I seem to always find myself gravitating toward male voices.
I definitely listen to a lot more music-by-women than I used to, but I still default to a certain kind of alternaboy band that I first got into in early high school -- so, yeah, I think formative bias plays into it, at least for me. Until I got to college, I listened to almost *no* music by women -- probably fewer than ten female artists or female-fronted bands, out of the dozens and dozens of bands I listened to. There still aren't nearly enough women making the kind of music I most want to listen to. ::sigh:: Fortunately my musical tastes have expanded enough that I can get my female representation, as you put it, in other ways.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 01:41 pm (UTC)Maybe it's that we (you and I and all the other women who like Eminem) don't mind if Eminem speaks derogatorily about women as long as he does it better than anyone else. You know, with more edge and honesty than, say, LL Cool J or whoever. Smart and talented and different equals good for most of us, I think.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-31 06:55 am (UTC)Oh - I like LL - it's mainly nostalgia love though, I do have to admit. Plus - he has a nice voice. Too often in rap the voice is overlooked. It is very important to me - Em's voice is great, Ice T back in the day was fierce, Snoop probably has the best, ummmm...more thoughts but work calls...
no subject
Date: 2003-07-31 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-07-30 04:46 pm (UTC)I love you. Maybe I'll think of something more profound to add when I'm not tired, but that's what I feel compelled to say right now. Besides, there are more profound thoughts than I can absorb in this thread already.
And I wasn't trying to drive you crazy--I thought you'd find it funny and ridiculous and it might make up for my going on about rapes last night.
no subject
Date: 2003-07-31 06:32 am (UTC)