(no subject)
Jan. 17th, 2003 10:45 pmDo you ever get behind on your friends' list and when you finally catch up on a really good, insiteful post there are already a lot of comments there and for just a moment you feel very self-conscious cause you don't know these people - just the original poster - so you kind of back away and make a mental note to try to catch that person later? Anyone? Just me?
I have the good luck to have an incredible friends list comprised of extremely intelligent witty people. I highly recommend it.
I have the good luck to have an incredible friends list comprised of extremely intelligent witty people. I highly recommend it.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-17 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-17 09:49 pm (UTC)Yikes. Sandbox metaphor. Could I be any more trite? Still, I'm just sayin'...you're Sisabet. You don't need to back away from anything. If anyone tells you differently, you send them to me and I'll put them straight.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-17 09:56 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-01-17 11:25 pm (UTC)I have so much vacation time this year and I have never been to the West Coast, so it is definately doable. Plus, Dawn got to go see Valerie, so it is only fair that I get to come see you.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-17 11:32 pm (UTC)Oh, and I always like a good sandbox metaphor, keep 'em coming.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-17 11:35 pm (UTC)Kitty -please post always in my LJ. I *heart* you.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-18 07:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-18 01:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-18 02:44 pm (UTC)Every now and then this happens to me in my own LJ. Very disconcerting. So yes, I know exactly what you mean.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-19 11:43 am (UTC)I was gonna say that I did get a lot of feedback re: "Closer" but most of it was the one or two line variety -- which is really great -I'm not complaining -- but still you long for more substantial comments. We talked about this before - responding to an email that says "I like you vid" with "Why? - please give me specifics - and were there parts that did not work for you?" I think "Closer" struck a nerve and I still haven't figured out why...maybe the lack of BtVS/AtS slash vids available on the web?
no subject
Date: 2003-01-19 12:29 pm (UTC)I know! Where did these people come from? How did they find me? Not that I mind -- it was just that I checked my e-mail and suddenly there were half a dozen posts from people I didn't even know, and they were having a conversation with each other rather than with me. It was the weirdest thing.
I think "Closer" struck a nerve and I still haven't figured out why...maybe the lack of BtVS/AtS slash vids available on the web?
Well, I think that's a big part of it, sure. I mean, think about all the slash fans out there reading and writing fic. But fic is much easier for slashers, because you can imagine all sorts of stuff that you'd never see on TV. Vids are by definition only what you see on the TV, so it's much harder to suggest, for example, Angel fucking Spike like an animal (although we can see plenty of het couples getting it on), because we actually don't see them together onscreen all that often. That's something that makes A/S much more difficult than, for example, whoever those guys on Highlander are, because the HL guys share a lot more screentime.
So "Closer" has a lot going for it. It's a really amazing vid, for starters -- it's got layers and thematics and parallels rather than just "ooo, hot half-naked guys!" It's a slash vid for a particular pairing that has a lot of slash fans. And it's a slash vid in a different fandom than a lot of other slash vids -- I got the impression (although I could be wrong) that a lot of people watched that vid who don't normally watch BtVS/AtS vids.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-19 01:44 pm (UTC)I think so too, and it kills me when I get an email calling it the "best vid ever" or some other such nonsense. I'm not being modest - "Closer" is a good vid, but it is by no means the quality (tech or otherwise) of other fandom vids that aren't in such an available medium as the web- I have a lot to learn, obviously, about vidding and it was the best effort I could have made. But it was weird to see your LJ in a debate about web videos and tape videos and feedback - I do not doubt that I got tons more feedback on Closer just because of it's availabilty, not its quality. That is kinda sad.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-19 04:30 pm (UTC)Yay, Sisbaet! This was clear to me as soon as you posted. ;) Because I, too, had the "Wow, the big kids came over to play!" reaction. And the post deserved to spark exchange like that. (I heart h.l's keen mind.) So it all made me smile and smile and, um, not have anything substantial to add at that particular moment. Sitting back and enjoying others' conversations is a fine thing, though.
no subject
Date: 2003-01-20 08:07 am (UTC)I know -- it's frustrating to not be able to take a genuine compliment just because we know the person saying it doesn't really have enough information to make that claim.
I do not doubt that I got tons more feedback on Closer just because of it's availabilty, not its quality. That is kinda sad.
Well, yes and no. A lot of tape-only people seem to not want their vids online because seeing vids on the computer screen is simply not as good as seeing them on a real TV, and I get that, but I think it's a tradeoff. If they don't post stuff online they're just not likely to get the same amount of response. I feel bad about that, absolutely, but I'm also a bit irked when someone gets huffy about it.
I'm not a big fan of vids on tape, myself. I didn't even order the VividCon tape. There were just too many vids I knew I wasn't going to want to watch again, either because I didn't care about the fandom at all or because I just didn't like the vid (or both). DVD, on the other hand, I would do in a heartbeat, so I could skip tracks I didn't want to see.